Bellew: Fury Needs More Than Size to Beat Usyk

Fury vs Usyk: Redefining Greatness in Heavyweight Boxing

A Battle of Contrasts

The upcoming clash between Tyson Fury and Oleksandr Usyk is not just another heavyweight bout; it is a fight that could redefine the boundaries of boxing greatness. Fury, with his towering frame and unorthodox style, meets Usyk, a master of technical boxing, in a contest that pits raw power against refined skill. This intriguing matchup has been extensively covered by BBC Sport, and it raises important questions about how we assess greatness in the sport.

Physical Attributes vs Technical Prowess

If Fury and Usyk were the same size, the dynamics of this fight would be starkly different. As former cruiserweight champion Tony Bellew puts it, “There is no way in the world Fury would win a round, let alone the fight.” Usyk’s technical superiority would eclipse Fury’s prowess. However, the reality of their physical differences cannot be ignored. Fury’s significant size advantage makes this contest far more intriguing. At 6ft 9in (though Bellew disputes this, claiming Fury is closer to 6ft 7in), Fury’s height and reach are formidable weapons against Usyk, who stands six inches shorter.

Usyk’s leap to the heavyweight division has been nothing short of remarkable. His ability to outclass opponents with his skill, despite a size disadvantage, speaks volumes about his talent. Bellew, who faced Usyk in his final fight, admits, “The guy is on another platform. There are boxers and then there is Usyk.” Such praise from a seasoned professional underscores the Ukrainian’s exceptional abilities.


Fury’s Challenge

Fury’s preparation for this fight has been meticulous. Unlike his bout against Francis Ngannou, Fury appears fully focused and in peak physical condition. Bellew acknowledges this, saying, “He looks in unbelievable shape. He has definitely taken this seriously.” Despite this, Bellew remains sceptical about Fury’s chances, highlighting that for the first time in his career, Fury faces an opponent who is naturally a better boxer.

Usyk’s footwork is expected to be a significant challenge for Fury. Bellew explains, “Usyk’s judgement of distance is just unreal. It’s like he has a laser on the end of his feet and toes.” This precise movement could neutralise Fury’s size advantage, making it difficult for him to land decisive blows. Fury will need to leverage his size, using his weight and reach to keep Usyk at bay and disrupt his rhythm.

Historical Comparisons

Comparisons between Fury and past heavyweight legends are inevitable. Promoters Bob Arum and Frank Warren have likened Fury to Muhammad Ali, a comparison that Bellew finds far-fetched. “They’re just doing their jobs but, please, stop it,” Bellew insists. Ali’s legacy extends beyond the ring; he was a cultural icon and a beacon of social justice. His battles were not just physical but ideological, making him incomparable in Bellew’s view.


Similarly, Bellew argues that Fury cannot be compared to Lennox Lewis, whom he regards as the greatest British heavyweight. “Lewis had everything: tactical brain, knockout punch, every shot in the armoury,” Bellew states. Lewis’s complete skill set and athletic prowess set a benchmark that Bellew believes Fury has not yet matched. If Fury does defeat Usyk, he would undoubtedly be the best of his era, but claiming the mantle of the greatest in British history might still elude him.


The Usyk Phenomenon

Usyk’s potential victory could elevate him to unprecedented heights in boxing history. His journey through various weight classes and his dominance over champions in their own backyards illustrate a rare calibre of boxer. “He has gone to every champion’s backyard and won belts,” Bellew points out. Such achievements, coupled with his Olympic and world championship gold medals, position Usyk as a unique figure in the sport.

However, Bellew expresses a concern shared by many in the boxing community: the quality of judging. He calls for neutral judges to ensure a fair outcome. “We need neutral judges – the best in the world with no agendas. Do not tarnish our sport on the biggest platform,” he urges. The integrity of the judging process is paramount, especially in a fight of this magnitude.

Conclusion: The Biggest Fight in Heavyweight History?

This bout between Fury and Usyk could be the defining fight of this generation. It represents a confluence of contrasting styles and physical attributes, making it a compelling spectacle. As Bellew aptly summarises, “We need a fair shake because this is the biggest fight in heavyweight history.”

For British boxing, a victory for Fury would be monumental, yet Bellew’s analysis suggests a challenging path ahead for the Gypsy King. Usyk’s technical brilliance and agility might prove insurmountable, even for a fighter of Fury’s calibre. The outcome of this fight could very well reshape our understanding of greatness in boxing, bridging the traditional reverence for size and power with the modern appreciation for skill and finesse.

As we await the clash in Riyadh, the boxing world stands on the precipice of witnessing history. Regardless of the result, the debate on what constitutes true greatness in boxing will continue to evolve, much like the sport itself.

Related articles



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Stay connected