Thurman Doubts Haney’s Welterweight Future

Thurman’s Blistering Critique of Haney: Courage and Power in Question

In a sport where bravado and skill intertwine, Keith Thurman’s recent comments on Devin Haney’s potential leap to the welterweight arena have sparked a vivid discussion in the boxing community. Thurman, a figure synonymous with bold statements and an unfiltered approach, has cast doubts on Haney’s readiness for this significant step up in competition.

Haney’s Welterweight Ambitions: Thurman’s Doubts

Thurman, never one to mince words, openly questioned Haney’s “tenacity” and “courage” for the welterweight division. According to Thurman, Haney’s performance against WBC light welterweight champion Regis Prograis raised questions about his punching power, even with a significant weight advantage. “He can’t punch,” Thurman remarked, suggesting that Haney’s lack of power would be a critical disadvantage in the welterweight class.

Photo IMAGO

Critique of Haney’s Fighting Style

A significant point of contention for Thurman centers around Haney’s boxing style. Drawing parallels with Shakur Stevenson’s approach, Thurman views Haney as a fighter who relies heavily on evasion and mobility, rather than direct confrontation. This, Thurman believes, is indicative of a certain hesitance to engage, a trait that could be detrimental in the higher weight class. “He’s the definition of boxing. ‘Hit and don’t get hit.’ There’s nothing wrong with that,” Thurman acknowledged, albeit with a hint of skepticism about its effectiveness in the welterweight division.

Prospects of a Haney-Thurman Showdown

Despite the speculation and potential fan interest, a bout between Thurman and Haney seems distant. Thurman noted the lack of communication from Haney’s camp, casting doubt on the likelihood of such a matchup. This stance underlines a broader theme in Thurman’s critique – a questioning of Haney’s readiness to confront the elite of the welterweight division.

Haney’s Evolution and the ‘Scared Fighter’ Tag

Thurman also touched upon Haney’s evolution as a fighter. Once known for a more aggressive style, Haney has transitioned to a method more reliant on defense and strategy, particularly after encounters with fighters like Jorge Linares and Joseph ‘Jojo’ Diaz. Thurman interprets this shift as a sign of reluctance to take risks, labeling Haney as a “scared fighter.” This bold claim is grounded in Thurman’s analysis of Haney’s reluctance to exploit openings, as seen in his fight with Prograis.

In conclusion, Keith Thurman’s critique of Devin Haney’s potential move to the welterweight class is a blend of tactical assessment and boxer bravado. Thurman’s comments reflect the intricacies of boxing styles and the psychological warfare that often precedes major fights. Whether Haney’s skill set and approach can prove Thurman wrong remains a tantalizing question for boxing enthusiasts.

Related articles

Comments

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Stay connected